Go Back   Colonial Fleets > ALTERNATE UNIVERSES > Other Science Fiction Shows
Notices
Other Science Fiction Shows A place to discuss all of the other Sci-Fi shows
which may tickle your fancy!

Reply

 
Thread Tools
Old May 9th, 2005, 11:30 AM   #1
Sci-Fi
Bad Email Address
 
Sci-Fi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lost in the Neutral Zone
Posts: 656

Star Trek ‘Star Trek: Enterprise’ prepares to drop out of warp for good

From the Timesleader:

‘Star Trek: Enterprise’ prepares to drop out of warp for good

By DAVE ITZKOFF New York Times News Service

Mon, May. 09, 2005

In the sector of planet Earth known as Hollywood, it was business as usual on the Paramount back lot. On a sunny day in early March, green-skinned aliens with zippers embedded in their faces were eating catered lunches, stagehands were disassembling lighting rigs labeled “Thorium Isotope Hazard,” and all were doing their best to ignore the fact that the warp engines on the starship Enterprise would soon be shut down, perhaps never to start up again. “Welcome,” a security guard said with heavy irony, “to the last days of Pompeii.”

On Friday, UPN will broadcast the final two episodes of “Star Trek: Enterprise,” the most recent spinoff of the genre-defining science-fiction series created by Gene Roddenberry nearly 40 years ago. The scenes filmed in March will bring closure to the story of a futuristic space vessel and its intrepid crew, but the end of “Enterprise” also casts into doubt the future of a venerable entertainment property that is entering a realm where no franchise has gone before.

Almost from the moment it was canceled by NBC in 1969, the original “Star Trek” set about defying television conventions: a three-season dud in prime time, it became a success in syndication, spawning a series of motion pictures, a merchandising empire and three television sequels (the syndicated hits “Star Trek: The Next Generation,” “Star Trek: Deep Space Nine” and “Star Trek: Voyager,” which helped start the UPN network in 1995).

“Enterprise,” a prequel devised by the veteran “Trek” producers Rick Berman and Brannon Braga, was supposed to be the series that would take the franchise into the future by venturing into its past.

Set 100 years before the first “Star Trek” series, “Enterprise” made its debut on UPN on Sept. 26, 2001, to more than 12.5 million viewers. By the end of its first season, its audience was just half as big, and by the end of its second season, barely a third of those original viewers were still watching. “People never really warmed up to `Enterprise,”’ said Ronald D. Moore, a former staff writer of the syndicated “Trek” television sequels who is now executive producer of the Sci Fi Channel’s new “Battlestar Galactica” series. “It never quite grabbed people viscerally and hung on, like the other shows did.”

As Jolene Blalock, who played the Vulcan officer T’Pol on “Enterprise,” explained: “The stories lacked intriguing content. They were boring.” A lifelong “Star Trek” fan, Blalock said she was dismayed by early “Enterprise” scripts that seemed to ignore basic tenets of the franchise’s chronology, and that offered revealing costumes instead of character development. “The audience isn’t stupid,” she said.

Aware of viewers’ disappointment, the producers made significant changes for its third season: A single, yearlong storyline was established, pitting the ship’s crew against a malevolent alien race called the Xindi, and Manny Coto, creator of the Showtime series “Odyssey 5,” was brought in as a co-executive producer. But the show’s ratings continued to erode.

The network says the problem was that most of “Enterprise’s” viewers were male, unlike those of its bigger shows, like “America’s Next Top Model.”
Sci-Fi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2005, 01:42 AM   #2
Senmut
Strike Leader
 
Senmut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wenatchee, Soviet of WA., Ex U.S.A.
Posts: 4,496

Default

With "B&B" in charge of the "creative" aspects, did we really expect anything else?
__________________
Populos stultus viris indignas honores saepe dat. -Horace
----------------------------
Fortuna est caeca. -Cicero
----------------------------
"You know the night before was a tough one when even the sound of the fizz hurts your head." -Mike Hammer.
Senmut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21st, 2005, 08:58 PM   #3
Senmut
Strike Leader
 
Senmut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wenatchee, Soviet of WA., Ex U.S.A.
Posts: 4,496

Default

I rest my case.
__________________
Populos stultus viris indignas honores saepe dat. -Horace
----------------------------
Fortuna est caeca. -Cicero
----------------------------
"You know the night before was a tough one when even the sound of the fizz hurts your head." -Mike Hammer.
Senmut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 19th, 2006, 06:39 AM   #4
Galactifan
Warrior
 
Galactifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 234

Default

Star Trek will never die. It will be back again and again...time will tell that there are always possibilities.
Galactifan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 19th, 2006, 08:55 AM   #5
Bijou88
Guest
 
Bijou88's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a

Star Trek

I have a theory about Star Trek. What happened to Star Trek is the same thing that happened to westerns on TV. Back in the 1960s, there was a ton of Westerns on TV. Gunsmoke, Bonanza, Wild Wild West, Cheyenne, The Riflemen, Maverick, Bronco, Wanted Dead or Alive, The Rebel, Bat Masterson, the list goes on and on. By the end of the decade, everything that could posibly be said in a western setting had been said. The genre was exhausted. People could watch only so many gunfights, swinging saloon doors and cattle rustlers. It was becoming passe. I think Star Trek is, for a long time, in the same boat. How many space anomolies, Phaser battles and warp core breaches can people possibly watch? There are 28 seasons worth of Star Trek. That doesn't even count the movies and the animated series. If you love Star Trek, like I do, there will always be reruns. In fact, a lack of a new series might be a boon to Star Trek. During the 70s, reruns were all we had. We had every episode, every line of dialog, every plot point tattooed on our brains. This created an insatible thirst for new Trek. Any little scrap of new trek was absorbed and appreciated. Believe it or not , the animated series was big news in fandom in 1974. The Bantam books series was read and savored because it gave us new adventures with Kirk, Spock and the rest of the Enterpirse family. I think that Star Trek should simmer for at least a decade. That will allow the fans to digest the episodes that have been produced. Who knows? By 2016, the Enterprise crew might reunite in "Star Trek Enterprise The Motion Picture!"

  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




So sez our Muffit!!!

For fans of the Classic Battlestar Galactica series



COPYRIGHT
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:43 PM. Contact the Fleet - Colonial Fleets - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.11, Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content and Graphics ©2000-Present Colonial Fleets
The Colonial Fleets Forums are run by Battlestar Galactica fans, paid for by Battlestar Galactica fans, for the enjoyment of fellow Battlestar Galactica fans.



©2000-2008 Colonial Fleets