PDA

View Full Version : Galactica 2003 Gallery plans


thomas7g
December 12th, 2003, 02:28 PM
I got a VERY clean recording of the show and a good frame capture.

Are there any images people want to see?

Kaith Rustaz
December 12th, 2003, 02:58 PM
a shot from the photoshoot, showing Adamas medals on his sash. :)

lordpenquin
December 12th, 2003, 07:07 PM
Pics of the Galactica and of the Vipers. The overhead shots of the Galactica.

Gemini1999
December 12th, 2003, 08:02 PM
Tom -

Some of the close up shots of the Mark II Viper firing its guns would be nice......

Bryan
________
LovelyWendie99 (http://www.lovelywendie99.com/)

The 14th Colony
December 12th, 2003, 08:45 PM
Kara Thrace's Viper interlocked with Apollo's, pushing it back toward the Galactica's landing bay.

The 14th Colony
December 12th, 2003, 08:47 PM
And a good shot of the Ragnor station ( I think that was the name), the station they docked at to refuel and reload. That was a cool looking space station. Maybe a shot of it with the Galactica in the foreground for scale, or when it docked along side it.

ViperAce
December 13th, 2003, 02:29 PM
Multiple Shots from the new Centurions few appearences ... and Vipers (both) & Cylon Raiders in combat

peter noble
December 13th, 2003, 02:38 PM
Tricia Helfer's chest. :devil:

Starbuck
December 13th, 2003, 02:43 PM
Originally posted by peter noble
Tricia Helfer's chest. :devil:

:blink: Men! :laugh: :girl:

peter noble
December 13th, 2003, 02:46 PM
Originally posted by Starbuck
:blink: Men! :laugh: :girl:

Nah, I didn't mean it. Annie Lockhart's still the only BSG girl for me.

Peter

jjrakman
December 13th, 2003, 03:24 PM
Lockhart is cute as heck, but boy she cries alot. I don't know if I could handle being around her after the first night, if you get my drift. And I think you do.

Westy
December 14th, 2003, 08:38 PM
Every picture you can make of the Galactica. Frame by frame if you can :)

callsignfalcon
December 14th, 2003, 08:56 PM
topic says it all :)

thomas7g
December 14th, 2003, 09:23 PM
I'm doing as best I can. But I'm learning there is ALOT of blur done on the space shots. Remember, they constantly moved the camera which blurs the image. Plus its very darkly lit. Still, I got a lot of images. Not as good as of the original show. But for now it wil be a nice little extra. :D

Westy
December 14th, 2003, 11:46 PM
That's awesome Tom! Can't wait to see them. Thanks for the work :-)

sdwebguy
December 16th, 2003, 01:53 PM
Pictuires of Caprica and Baltar's home.

unowhoandwhy
December 17th, 2003, 03:42 PM
Call me a hopeless romantic (and I am), but I would love any pics of the Tyrol/Boomer reunion. Especially ones where that lovely man looks deep into her eyes & puts his hand to her face... SIGH... Grace Park is a lucky gal, I'd trade places with her any day!

lordpenquin
December 17th, 2003, 07:13 PM
They used the darkness and the blur to hide the fact that they didn't have the budget for extended special effects. I think that with today's technology, they could do absolute magic with minitures. There is no subsitute for a well crafted model. Screw the 100% CG images. Give me a blue screen with a mini viper model anyday. I'll give you an example:

Alien

I recently saw the re-release of it to the theaters, and after 25 years, the space shots still work. you know why? Because they used hand painted matte paintings, and well crafted minitures. Now look at the last starfighter. That was the first film (besides tron) to use extended CG work. At the time, it looked great. Now, it's a dated piece of poo. After years of upgrades, any CG work looks dated, but good blue screen, matte painting, and minitures stand the test of time...

Gemini1999
December 17th, 2003, 07:25 PM
Originally posted by lordpenquin
I'll give you an example:

Alien

I recently saw the re-release of it to the theaters, and after 25 years, the space shots still work. you know why? Because they used hand painted matte paintings, and well crafted minitures. Now look at the last starfighter. That was the first film (besides tron) to use extended CG work. At the time, it looked great. Now, it's a dated piece of poo. After years of upgrades, any CG work looks dated, but good blue screen, matte painting, and minitures stand the test of time...

Lordpenguin -

I went to go see "Alien" for the re-release as well. I was absolutley amazed how well the SFX held up for being 25 years old! They really did cobble together some amazing stuff considering what they had to work with. There are some films being released these days where the CG stuff is almost as obvious as a crappy model or some really bad blue screen work. I don't care if it comes out of a computer, there are still some that try and do it on the cheap and it looks it for all their efforts.

Regards,
Bryan
________
VERMONT MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES (http://vermont.dispensaries.org/)

DCRabbit
December 19th, 2003, 06:23 PM
Kara's butt. I may hate the PC remake.. but hey, pretty is pretty. And being a guy, you can't blame me. So there.


DC

thomas7g
December 19th, 2003, 06:39 PM
uhmmm..... I uh.... well...

:nervous:

Are you sure you mean KARA?

mixedbag
December 19th, 2003, 11:05 PM
I would like a good and big pic of the Galactica and the Fleet that they showed right after the battle at the Ragnar station in part II. It's the shot where you also hear the Female priest chanting as well and they say...So say we all a bit later.

Darth Marley
December 19th, 2003, 11:37 PM
A close-up of Col. Tigh's bruise.Wasn't there a scene of him with a bottle in his hand?


I see many have beaten me to the request for gratuitous T & A shots.

Kara did seem kind of butch,but that wouldn't stop me.

DCRabbit
December 20th, 2003, 12:42 AM
Yup. Katee. My type. And since hardly anyone else agrees, well.. I'd take her off all your hands. Sure.. no problem.

DC

Titon
December 20th, 2003, 06:31 AM
I think that with today's technology, they could do absolute magic with minitures. There is no subsitute for a well crafted model. Screw the 100% CG images. Give me a blue screen with a mini viper model anyday.

I beg to differ. With today's computer technology and time you *can* make cgi look even more real than a physical model. Most FX today is based on cutting corners. Images maps have been the main stay in computer graphics since i began cgi. But you can make kitbashed cgi ships and the details that are on a physical model can be replicated in the cg enviroment. But it takes time time time and a whole lot of patients. Don't get me wrong, filiming actual miniatures is still an excellant way to go but very costly and even more time consuming than cgi. If you give me a budget, time and detail level you want to achieve in the end i doubt you'd be able to tell the difference from physical and cg.

:)

Stevew
December 20th, 2003, 07:19 AM
Don you are 100% right. When you can put up the piks I think poeple will see or they can always go to Lee's page
S:D :D :D