Log in

View Full Version : Colonel Tigh / Colonel Tye


Antelope
February 10th, 2005, 08:55 AM
I was watching PBS last night and they did a vinette on a Colonel Tye (pronounced the same as Tigh) who was an African-American Colonel who served in the British forces during the American Revolutionary War. I wonder whether Galactica's Colonel Tigh was inspired by this person or if it was an interesting coincidence. Knowing now that "Starbuck" is a name from "Moby Dick" I thought maybe Larson is familiar with this person. At any rate here is the story of Colonel Tye:

Colonel Tye, the most feared and respected guerrilla commander of the Revolution, was one of the many enslaved Africans who escaped and fought for the British.

Known in his youth as Titus, he was one of four young men owned by John Corlies of Shrewsbury, in the eastern part of Monmouth County, New Jersey. Shrewsbury Quakers, under increasing pressure from their Philadelphia-influenced counterparts to the west, finally began to end slavery among themselves in the 1760s. Corlies did not follow the local practice of educating his slaves or of freeing them on their 21st birthdays, and by 1775, he was one of the few remaining Quaker slaveholders in Monmouth County.

In November 1775, the day after Dunmore's Proclamation was issued, 22-year old Titus fled from his cruel, quick-tempered master, joining the flood of Monmouth County blacks who sought refuge with the British as soldiers, sailors and workers. Titus changed his name, gaining notoriety three years later as Captain Tye, the pride of Dunmore's Ethiopian Regiment.

While not formally commissioning black officers, the British army often bestowed titles out of respect, and Tye quickly earned their respect. In his first known military incursion, the June, 1778 Battle of Monmouth (in which not a single black from the county fought for the patriots), Tye captured a captain in the Monmouth militia.

In July, 1779, Tye's band launched a raid on Shrewsbury, and carried away clothing, furniture, horses, cattle, and two of the town's inhabitants. With his "motley crew" of blacks and white refugees known as "cow-boys," Tye continued to attack and plunder patriot homes, using his knowledge of Monmouth County's swamps, rivers and inlets to strike suddenly and disappear quickly. These raids, often aimed at former masters and their friends, were a combination of banditry, reprisal, and commission; Tye and his men were well-paid by the British, sometimes earning five gold guineas.

During the harsh winter of 1779, Tye was among an elite group of twenty-four black Loyalists, known as the Black Brigade, who joined with the Queen's Rangers, a British guerrilla unit, to protect New York City and to conduct raids for food and fuel.

By 1780, Colonel Tye had become an important military force. Within one week in June, he led three actions in Monmouth County. On June 9, Tye and his men murdered Joseph Murray, hated by the Loyalists for his summary execution of captured Tories under a local vigilante law. On June 12, while the British attacked Washington's dwindling troops, Tye and his band launched a daring attack on the home of Barnes Smock, capturing the militia leader and twelve of his men, destroying their cannon, depriving Washington of needed reinforcements, and striking fear into the hearts of local patriots.

In response, Governor Livingston, who had tried two years before to abolish slavery in New Jersey, invoked martial law -- a measure which proved totally ineffective -- even as large numbers of blacks, heartened by news of Tye's feats, fled to British-held New York.

In a series of raids throughout the summer, Tye continued to debilitate and demoralize the patriot forces. In a single day, he and his band captured eight militiamen (including the second in command), plundered their homes, and took them to imprisonment in New York, virtually undetected and without suffering a single casualty.

In September, 1780 Tye led a surprise attack on the home of Captain Josiah Huddy, whom Loyalists had tried to capture for years. Amazingly, Huddy and his friend Lucretia Emmons managed to hold off their attackers for two hours, until the Loyalists flushed them out by setting the house afire. During the battle, Tye was shot in the wrist, and days later, what was thought to be minor wound turned fatal when lockjaw set in.

After Tye's death, Colonel Stephen Blucke of the Black Pioneers replaced him as leader of the raiders, continuing their attacks well after the British defeat at Yorktown. Tye's reputation lived on, among his comrades as well as the Patriots, who argued that the war would have been won much sooner had Tye been enlisted on their side.

jewels
February 10th, 2005, 03:09 PM
what I find most interesting about that is slavery wouldn't be outlawed in Britain until sometime around the 1830s (if I remember correctly) yet these men fought in Britain's stead. Willberforce was a ringleader in the final outlawing of slavery, but I believe died either just before the final vote or just before the law went into effect. The U.S. wouldn't debate slavery in earnest until the 1850s. Ironically, these men may have chosen wisely which side they were on had they known the change coming in England's attitudes toward slaves.

Antelope
February 11th, 2005, 08:41 AM
The British offerred freedom to ALL blacks in the American colonies if they were willing to serve in the British military during the war. The vast majority of blacks that fought in the revolution fought for the British since their immediate freedom depended on it. During the PBS show they talked about how that in large areas of the South blacks abandoned the plantations in an attempt to reach British held cities to obtain their freedom.

I think this is one of those things you don't hear about in history class since the popular idea is that blacks despite being enslaved supported the revolution which is apparantly not true for the vast majority. In school we learn about Crispus Attacks but not Colonel Tye.

The more you know about that time the more things seem not so black and white. After taking a Colonial American history class in my university days I came to the opinion that had I lived in the days of the American Revolution I may well have sided with the British or simply not participated like the majority of the population. You never hear today in school as a kid that the British spent more money to militarily defend the colonies against foreign aggression than they ever collected in their hated taxes. To some extent the colonials in America were like welfare receipients who scream when you cut their programs or start asking them to pay their way.

jewels
February 11th, 2005, 08:58 AM
To be declared free men if they fought for the British. Then their participation makes quite a bit of sense. It also makes some of the founding fathers', who released their slaves upon their deaths, decisions make more sense. Washington and Jefferson both freed their slaves in their wills, I believe.

Antelope
February 11th, 2005, 11:08 AM
It also makes some of the founding fathers', who released their slaves upon their deaths, decisions make more sense. Washington and Jefferson both freed their slaves in their wills, I believe.

They mentioned some of the conflicts in the minds of some of our founders in the show. Jefferson in particular was very inciteful. He personally was against slavery and yet owned slaves. In his mind the issue was what would happen if the slaves were freed. He wanted a mechanism to send the slaves back to Africa but slaves freed at that time showed little to no desire to return to Africa. In Jefferson's world view freed slaves would in fact be a separate colonizing force in America competing against the English descendants. They never really considered in those days that we could become a fairly harmonious muti-ethnic nation. I think Jefferson would have been among many in his day and for generations later who thought, "I wish we never brought the Africans over but what do we do now that they are here." It would appear that Jefferson in particular and other founding fathers were well aware of the wrongness of slavery and wanted to end it but were at a loss on how to accomplish this without causing problems that in their minds could even be worse for the country.

Archangel
February 11th, 2005, 11:48 AM
Now there's a man who deserves a lot more respect than history has given him. :D :thumbsup:

Thanks for the info, Antelope. Kinda makes you wonder how many more people were there throughout the ages whose accomplishments are important but not recognized.

jewels
February 11th, 2005, 02:38 PM
Antelope, I forget how long it took to end slavery once they started talking about it in England. I think it was something like 40 years though, I recall it being a lot of Wilberforce's legislative lifespan. 40 years would put it back close to the time of our constitution's writing though.

Where is KJ when you need him? he'd probably know the dates!