martok2112
August 20th, 2004, 07:17 AM
I realize that this is very, very old hat to most people at the more respectable boards (CF,CA,Galactica 2003.net) but it is truly sad when one can only view the BBoards at Skiffy as nothing more than a place to get a good laugh.
(Sidebar...I must have missed something that would cause the listing of a certain url to be retranslated as *banned site* Could someone please enlighten me in a PM? -Martok)
Paranoid delusions by posters who wish to label fans of one version of BSG or the other as "Universal Studios Employees" if you have even the slightest affinity for the new show, or "Glen Larson Spies" if you are a solid TOS fan, while being old jokes, are still a sad review of science fiction fandom in general.
It is bad enough when one type of science fiction fan tries to put his/herself on a pedastal by claiming that they have more discerning tastes in what constitutes favorable science-fiction. The acquired arrogance is merely a compensation for a pitiful childhood, apparently having been beat up, or picked on by their peers (read: preps, jocks, drama queens, and the like) during their awkward youth , so such fans take it out on other sci-fi fans in an attempt to vie for some self-deluded sense of superiority.
But the delusional attitudes of quite a few sci-fi fans at Skiffy truly make sci-fi fandom a laughing stock in the general public's eye. No wonder that sci-fi fans as a collective are often referred to as "non-entities" in more real world oriented BBs. And I know more than one poster has seen this happen.
And then, I have seen some call for the end to infighting among fans of a particular sect of sci-fi, specifically Battlestar Galactica, who then turn around in the same post and attack the exact opposite of what they like about either Battlestar. (Stop the infighting, nu-Galactica is a ripoff.) or (Stop the infighting, TOS was inferior) That is a rather backhanded call to peace, and often disinclines many to acquiesce to the admonition. (Means: Hell no, we won't go!)
There are also rather biased claims at Skiffy that if you post something at CF or CA that speaks favorably of the new BATTLESTAR GALACTICA, you will earn the ire of TOS fans, and they will viciously attack you. (The same can probably be said of "site-who-must-not-be-named" in regard to TOS'ers who post there.) Maybe in a far less kinder past, regardless of where you stood. Today, however, if you irresponsibly start attacking the original show first, then start citing the virtues of what you like about the new show....then yes, you can definitely expect some flack. (Vice versa with TOS'ers possibly doing the same at "site-who-must-not-be-named")
And for those who would blindly attack the original show, then start praising the new one because they didn't have a concept about the new show's true origins, I have no sympathy.
However, if you state that you are a fan of TOS, and that in NO WAY does your praise of the new show come at the expense of the original...well, some will accept that you are sincere, and have no intention of slighting TOS fans with your comments.
But THERE ARE THOSE who take the stuff too personally anyway. In their eyes, anyone who praises, or even remotely favors the new show is a traitor to the loyalty of the original show. They want to cast aspersions to your loyalty. Conversely, anyone who trashes the new show, citing the supposed superiority of the classic show, is viewed by the strict mini-fans as someone who needs their "inner child" kicked to the curb and told to grow up. And then, EVERYONE has to have a wake up call about what it is to have LOYALTY to the things in life that REALLY matter. It doesn't matter how many times you try to explain to them that you would love to see a continuation of the classic show along with them, SOME (not all) members of the TOS only fandom simply write you off as something beneath their utter contempt. All the same, no matter how many times a TOS fan tries to say "Hey, we're glad you like the mini, and hope it is what you wanted. It's just not our cup of tea.", SOME (not all) pro-mini fans will simply write off the TOS'ers as killjoys throwing sour grapes about the success of the mini. (It's that whole "acquired arrogance" thing at work again.) The most visible aspect of this is at the Skiffy boards where (despite the so-called "moderating") it is basically a free fire zone of "basement dwelling mudslingers". Sour grapes abound, delusions run rampant, and immaturity is an accepted way of life.
Which of course leads to the question of what constitutes a TRUE fan of something. It is a question that in my opinion will never be fully resolved as long as people harbor narrow minded notions of loyalty regarding a grandfathered aspect of fandom. Now, let me clarify: Loyalty to the things that matter in life is NOT a narrow minded notion. Loyalty to family; loyalty to friends; loyalty to deity, royalty/government and country...those are quantifiable loyalties in the real world. Loyalty to a sports collective or a television show, whilst passionate, is often the FODDER of jokes! When "loyalties" come into question regarding such trivial things, a casual observer cannot help but make the most uproarious belly laugh of their lives. Mentions of loyalties in such things are probably best kept within the circles of the passion in question. Not tossed about like self-righteous flags to be snickered at by casual, indifferent observers.
There seemed to be a time (short lived, in the direction we're headed) that being a sci-fi fan could actually be a source of pride for us. But now, some of us are NO BETTER than the "in-crowds" that some of us had to endure during our formative years because of our petty bickering, mudslinging, spin doctoring, posturing, gossip-mongering, and oneupsmanship.
Various camps thrive within a single fandom of any given thing. With the Trek fans you have the Roddenberry Loyalists, the middle of the road Trek fans, the Star Wars converts, and the "as long as it looks and feels like Trek" fans. see this thread for my analysis:
http://boards.startrek.com/community/messages.html?;act=ST;f=13;t=33170744
In the Galactica fandom, it is no simpler:
TOS fans vehemently opposed to the new show and other views
TOS fans opposed to the new show, but open to other fans
NEW show fans vehemently opposed to TOS and other views
NEW show fans opposed to TOS, but open to other views
Fans of BOTH Shows.
It is nice when these camps can have friendly debates with one another about aspects of a given show.
It is when these debates turn into spiteful (often venom laced) arguments that the whole of sci-fi fandom is reduced to the "laughing stock" we try so desperately to avoid.
Sci-fi fandom likes to pride itself on looking toward more optimistic, and enlightened futures, just as the world tries to pride itself on more "enlightened" points of view existing today.
We are no closer to seeing the fruition of such things in our lifetime. Just as the world still has its problems of racial bigotry, disrcrimination, religious persecution, and other damnable aspects of REAL LIFE, so do sci-fi fandoms have their share of intolerance, inflexibility, and immaturity.
Fortunately, there are places like Colonial Fleets, Cylon Alliance, and Galactica 2003.net where, for the greater part, fans can present their points of view without too much fear of derision by opposing viewpoints, and a greater sense of maturity and civility prevails. But there are still those in the boards who would rather make those who oppose their views feel like the lowest form of daggit droppings for even existing.
And in such cases, one bad apple can spoil the whole bunch on occasion.
But hey, I'm just a sci-fi fan like anyone else, equally guilty of some of the indictments I've stated above. I just want to see sci-fi fandom be a source of pride that can be presented to the general public in a good light.
Rant over, shields up, turbolasers charged!
Respectfully to all,
Martok2112
(Sidebar...I must have missed something that would cause the listing of a certain url to be retranslated as *banned site* Could someone please enlighten me in a PM? -Martok)
Paranoid delusions by posters who wish to label fans of one version of BSG or the other as "Universal Studios Employees" if you have even the slightest affinity for the new show, or "Glen Larson Spies" if you are a solid TOS fan, while being old jokes, are still a sad review of science fiction fandom in general.
It is bad enough when one type of science fiction fan tries to put his/herself on a pedastal by claiming that they have more discerning tastes in what constitutes favorable science-fiction. The acquired arrogance is merely a compensation for a pitiful childhood, apparently having been beat up, or picked on by their peers (read: preps, jocks, drama queens, and the like) during their awkward youth , so such fans take it out on other sci-fi fans in an attempt to vie for some self-deluded sense of superiority.
But the delusional attitudes of quite a few sci-fi fans at Skiffy truly make sci-fi fandom a laughing stock in the general public's eye. No wonder that sci-fi fans as a collective are often referred to as "non-entities" in more real world oriented BBs. And I know more than one poster has seen this happen.
And then, I have seen some call for the end to infighting among fans of a particular sect of sci-fi, specifically Battlestar Galactica, who then turn around in the same post and attack the exact opposite of what they like about either Battlestar. (Stop the infighting, nu-Galactica is a ripoff.) or (Stop the infighting, TOS was inferior) That is a rather backhanded call to peace, and often disinclines many to acquiesce to the admonition. (Means: Hell no, we won't go!)
There are also rather biased claims at Skiffy that if you post something at CF or CA that speaks favorably of the new BATTLESTAR GALACTICA, you will earn the ire of TOS fans, and they will viciously attack you. (The same can probably be said of "site-who-must-not-be-named" in regard to TOS'ers who post there.) Maybe in a far less kinder past, regardless of where you stood. Today, however, if you irresponsibly start attacking the original show first, then start citing the virtues of what you like about the new show....then yes, you can definitely expect some flack. (Vice versa with TOS'ers possibly doing the same at "site-who-must-not-be-named")
And for those who would blindly attack the original show, then start praising the new one because they didn't have a concept about the new show's true origins, I have no sympathy.
However, if you state that you are a fan of TOS, and that in NO WAY does your praise of the new show come at the expense of the original...well, some will accept that you are sincere, and have no intention of slighting TOS fans with your comments.
But THERE ARE THOSE who take the stuff too personally anyway. In their eyes, anyone who praises, or even remotely favors the new show is a traitor to the loyalty of the original show. They want to cast aspersions to your loyalty. Conversely, anyone who trashes the new show, citing the supposed superiority of the classic show, is viewed by the strict mini-fans as someone who needs their "inner child" kicked to the curb and told to grow up. And then, EVERYONE has to have a wake up call about what it is to have LOYALTY to the things in life that REALLY matter. It doesn't matter how many times you try to explain to them that you would love to see a continuation of the classic show along with them, SOME (not all) members of the TOS only fandom simply write you off as something beneath their utter contempt. All the same, no matter how many times a TOS fan tries to say "Hey, we're glad you like the mini, and hope it is what you wanted. It's just not our cup of tea.", SOME (not all) pro-mini fans will simply write off the TOS'ers as killjoys throwing sour grapes about the success of the mini. (It's that whole "acquired arrogance" thing at work again.) The most visible aspect of this is at the Skiffy boards where (despite the so-called "moderating") it is basically a free fire zone of "basement dwelling mudslingers". Sour grapes abound, delusions run rampant, and immaturity is an accepted way of life.
Which of course leads to the question of what constitutes a TRUE fan of something. It is a question that in my opinion will never be fully resolved as long as people harbor narrow minded notions of loyalty regarding a grandfathered aspect of fandom. Now, let me clarify: Loyalty to the things that matter in life is NOT a narrow minded notion. Loyalty to family; loyalty to friends; loyalty to deity, royalty/government and country...those are quantifiable loyalties in the real world. Loyalty to a sports collective or a television show, whilst passionate, is often the FODDER of jokes! When "loyalties" come into question regarding such trivial things, a casual observer cannot help but make the most uproarious belly laugh of their lives. Mentions of loyalties in such things are probably best kept within the circles of the passion in question. Not tossed about like self-righteous flags to be snickered at by casual, indifferent observers.
There seemed to be a time (short lived, in the direction we're headed) that being a sci-fi fan could actually be a source of pride for us. But now, some of us are NO BETTER than the "in-crowds" that some of us had to endure during our formative years because of our petty bickering, mudslinging, spin doctoring, posturing, gossip-mongering, and oneupsmanship.
Various camps thrive within a single fandom of any given thing. With the Trek fans you have the Roddenberry Loyalists, the middle of the road Trek fans, the Star Wars converts, and the "as long as it looks and feels like Trek" fans. see this thread for my analysis:
http://boards.startrek.com/community/messages.html?;act=ST;f=13;t=33170744
In the Galactica fandom, it is no simpler:
TOS fans vehemently opposed to the new show and other views
TOS fans opposed to the new show, but open to other fans
NEW show fans vehemently opposed to TOS and other views
NEW show fans opposed to TOS, but open to other views
Fans of BOTH Shows.
It is nice when these camps can have friendly debates with one another about aspects of a given show.
It is when these debates turn into spiteful (often venom laced) arguments that the whole of sci-fi fandom is reduced to the "laughing stock" we try so desperately to avoid.
Sci-fi fandom likes to pride itself on looking toward more optimistic, and enlightened futures, just as the world tries to pride itself on more "enlightened" points of view existing today.
We are no closer to seeing the fruition of such things in our lifetime. Just as the world still has its problems of racial bigotry, disrcrimination, religious persecution, and other damnable aspects of REAL LIFE, so do sci-fi fandoms have their share of intolerance, inflexibility, and immaturity.
Fortunately, there are places like Colonial Fleets, Cylon Alliance, and Galactica 2003.net where, for the greater part, fans can present their points of view without too much fear of derision by opposing viewpoints, and a greater sense of maturity and civility prevails. But there are still those in the boards who would rather make those who oppose their views feel like the lowest form of daggit droppings for even existing.
And in such cases, one bad apple can spoil the whole bunch on occasion.
But hey, I'm just a sci-fi fan like anyone else, equally guilty of some of the indictments I've stated above. I just want to see sci-fi fandom be a source of pride that can be presented to the general public in a good light.
Rant over, shields up, turbolasers charged!
Respectfully to all,
Martok2112