PDA

View Full Version : I question Bonnie’s veracity


dvo47p
August 14th, 2003, 12:31 PM
Ronald D. Moore on The Scifi Channel’s new Battlestar Galactica site posted:
"When I sat down and re-watched the original pilot," Moore says, "I was struck by the fact that, at its core, Galactica had a very, very dark premise. It may be the darkest premise of any pilot I've ever seen."

True enough but I don’t believe he has never said anything about the rest of the series. I find it somewhat odd to suppose that he has not watched the entire series, the good and not so good episodes. Moore is doing this mini without significant knowledge concerning the depth of the characters or the storyline of TOS.

This fits with Bonnie’s “So what we want to do is a four-hour mini. Basically, give it a new life – maintain the franchise but modernize it and if it works in a mini, then we’ll develop it into a series. If in fact the audience says, ‘Been there, done that’ then we won’t go there.”

Polaris was one of three candidates to be picked up by the Sci-Fi Channel. J. Michael Straczynski’s statement about ’Polaris’ was rejected for being "too science fictiony". That seems very peculiar for a cable channel named ‘The Scifi Channel’. I think they went with a Vampire mini and Tremors.

Not as odd as the Farscape last minute cancellation. Bonnie Hammer on the record @ Cinescape:
"We are excited to renew our commitment to this smart, sexy, intelligent and fun series that rewrites the book on sci-fi entertainment. Farscape is not only the most ambitious original series on basic cable, we think it's one of the best-written shows on television, period. It's no wonder that it's the top-rated series on SCI FI for three years running." Hammer went on to brag that Farscape increased the number of female viewers and broadened ‘The Scifi Channel’s demographics.

If Ms. Hammer was so enamored with the demographics of Farscape, why air Farscape at 10:00PM EST? The series was slated to finish its third season in January 2002, with a fourth season set to debut later in the year. Everyone knows what happened at the just before the last minute of production of the fifth season. The main protagonist engaged to the ‘babe’, then freeze dried in a rowboat.

shiningstar
August 14th, 2003, 06:14 PM
WHo knows WHAT is in that PEA SIZED brain of hers.
Maybe when she does produce a GOOD show .or sees one......
she has a fear of success .......making her
sabatoge it so it will fail by ..........putting it in a
10:00 PM time slot ..........or as in the case of BSG ......
making it as assinine as possible and knowing NO
SAIN person will watch it.

Senmut
August 14th, 2003, 08:43 PM
She's just another producer-type. So full of their own bloated ego, that they, and ONLY they, know what's right.

shiningstar
August 15th, 2003, 05:50 AM
I agree with THAT Senmut! The GIRL is definately
a "LEGEND" ............................IN HER OWN MIND!

Charybdis
August 15th, 2003, 07:00 AM
The problem is that we know what's going on here because we are the die-hards for the original Galactica, but I bet that the mini does well enought to go to a series because all the "casual" fans who barely remember the original will watch the thing. They may tune out shortly thereafter, but once the initial ratings come in, Hammer will say what a success it was and then launch the new Galactica series...

most fans out there are gullible and will watch it just because they are remaking it without any knowledge of what they have done to the show...

shiningstar
August 15th, 2003, 11:41 AM
That may be Charybdis ........but it is also possible that with
the MOVIE coming out that the MOVIE can educate the fans
as to what BSG is SUPPOSED to be instead of the way
THat moran and jammerhammer "REIMAGINED" it.

dvo47p
August 15th, 2003, 11:47 AM
Ok the bad news is less science fiction the really bad news from the Scaper's zine, SCIFI RATINGS:
http://starburstcards.com/KarlswebNewscape/Archive-3.htm
In related news, ratings for the top 10 cable networks for the month of July are now available. Sci Fi fared well, coming in seventh among age group 18-49, and fifth among people aged 25-54. USA Network was first in both categories, as well as in the 18-34 age group.


I remember reading somewhere online that she wanted a ‘Martin Scorsese’ to choose The Scifi Channel for programming, he is a great director but science fiction is not his forte. She is looking to her self-interest not Scifi’s.

TNN IS NOW Spike TV, I wonder what The Scifi Channel will be called?

Hammer is trying to fill a gap between premium & network TV, like Ted Turner did so well. Taken was done on Scifi cause Band of Brothers & From the Earth to the Moon did not keep the initial ratings success. So Spielberg chose Scifi for Taken. Remember looking @ the old schedulebot Hammer had primetime to late night with Taken. Plus on the weekend she ran the five episodes twice a day Sat. & Sun.

TNN is now Spike TV, I wonder what The Scifi Channel will be called?

shiningstar
August 15th, 2003, 12:58 PM
with OUR luck...........it'll be HAMMERVILLE .........Like I'll watch that!