Interesting note about Sci-Fi moderation

[Muffit]

Interesting. I posted late last night to what should have been position #40. It got moderated then posted this morning to slot #7. Now at noon it is at slot #13. This is pretty odd.

In either case, it has been my experience that people tend to read the newest posts only, assuming they have already read the older ones. By putting our posts back at the top (buried between older posts) , chances of anyone reading them or us being able to intervene between pro-moore bunches is pretty slim.

Anyone else notice this?

:muffit:

[jewels]

Actually the most recent posts are at the top. It just takes 9 gizzillion years for anything new to post. Makes the post numbers irrelevant too.

[Muffit]

Ah, I see now, thanks Jewels. Wonder why they reversed it?

:muffit:

[jewels]

This is what the guys thought:
Originally posted by jewels
Makes the post numbers irrelevant too.
It could just be a software funtion though.

[newt]

Well I haven't been able to post ANYTHING...looks like I'm banned. I just tried another which is non critical but if they'r ebanning I wish they'd email me why....

[peter noble]

http://www.scifi.com/mbb/browse.php?rid=3985

[jewels]

Peter, you dog, you! ROTFLMAO. (she's not that bad looking a girl, but she couldn't compete with Maren or Dirk in the looks dept.)

[peter noble]

Originally posted by jewels
Peter, you dog, you! ROTFLMAO. (she's not that bad looking a girl, but she couldn't compete with Maren or Dirk in the looks dept.)

jewels, you haven't seen the pic of her in last month's SFX. She looks like Miss Piggy!

Best,

Peter