Log in

View Full Version : This area is read-only. No new posts will be added.


dvo47p
April 17th, 2003, 08:44 AM
I must have pissed off someone @ The Scifi Channel?

http://bboard.scifi.com/bboard/browse.cgi/1/5/531/855

*********************************************
I’m not making this up, really

Date: 04/16/2003
From: dvo47p

I got this from The Scifi Guys about new ‘The Scifi Channel’ shows coming to you: I’m beginning to wonder if DeSanto is sort of glad he is not working for Scifi.

Ya know 'Battlestar Galactica' just might suck no matter who writes for it, produces it and stars in it.

<http://www.scifiguys.com/newsletters/v6i5.html>

New Sci Fi Channel Series? Eeek!

If I were trying to make up up jokes about new shows, I couldn't come up with this stuff. According to the Sci Fi Channel, here's what they have coming in the near future. "Dead Lawyers," is a show about unscrupulous lawyers who try to redeem themselves by coming back from the dead and helping people. Dead paralegals are apparently optional. "The Divide" is a show about a psychic DJ who teams up with his dead twin sister and a coroner to solve crimes. In "Legion" a man sells his soul to the devil to save his sister and now must wander the Earth helping people. Actually, sounds a bit like "Brimestone." Also look for "Stargate Atlantis," a spin-off of "Stargate" with a new team and "Painkiller Jane" a secret agent enhanced with super healing powers.

More From the Sci Fi Channel?

If "Dead Lawyers" didn't scare you off, here are some more ideas percolating at the Sci Fi Channel. "Clive Barker's The Evil One" is a series where the protagonist is evil? That's different, I guess. "Total Eclipse" has a new faculty member join a college where the supernatural is just part of the curriculum. "Suture Girl" is about an ad exec who dies and then is rebuilt with superpowers to help the innocent. There's more, but this is all I can handle right now.

OK yet even more stupid shit from The Scifi Channel………..

http://worldsofjms.com/projects.htm#polaris

J. Michael Straczynski developed a series for the Sci-Fi Channel called Polaris.
This project began life in February 2001. Straczynski turned in at least two scripts including one for a two-hour pilot.

Polaris made it to the final three candidates to be picked up by the Sci-Fi Channel. Unfortunately, Straczynski announced in January 2003 that Polaris was turned down for being "too science fictiony". After the turnaround period has expired, Straczynski plans to take the project elsewhere. On 01 April 2003, Straczynski said that another studio might be showing strong interest in Polaris.

Straczynski says, "I've kept the basic storyline of Polaris under lock and key because it's the kind of thing which, once you hear it, you know instantly why the Sci-Fi Channel picked it up to develop, even though it's a fairly pristine area inside the genre, and I'm trying to keep competition to a minimum for now."

----------------------------------------------------------------------

http://bboard.scifi.com/bboard/browse.cgi/1/5/531/855

adjudicator
April 17th, 2003, 08:53 AM
Yea you did, wow.

jewels
April 17th, 2003, 09:01 AM
Dvo: methinks if DeSanto got Galactica back, he'd be working for Universal and not SciFi. SciFi might still be the broadcast outlet but they'd have burned their bridge to the control room so to speak. Methinks.

dvo47p
April 17th, 2003, 09:02 AM
SCIFI.COM's forum for Battlestar Galactica fans

Attention, Battlestar Galactica fans! We have to close the BBoard for an hour or two while we install a new message board system. Come back later and tell us what you think.

dvo47p
April 17th, 2003, 09:05 AM
Methinks thou art right.......................

Originally posted by jewels Dvo: methinks if DeSanto got Galactica back, he'd be working for Universal and not SciFi. SciFi might still be the broadcast outlet but they'd have burned their bridge to the control room so to speak. Methinks.

The Scifi Channel is to cheap to do BSG right..........

newt
April 17th, 2003, 09:43 AM
maybe they're enhancing the bboard to rid it of trolls, etc....make it more accountable. They're only doing it for Galactica. I hope they don't turn to censorship and allow only supporters of the remake to post, but wouldn't be surprised....

LucianG
April 17th, 2003, 09:45 AM
Top down board is now in place. It's is supposedly moderated.

http://www.scifi.com/mbb/browse.php?tid=1

Lucian

Flamingo Girl
April 17th, 2003, 10:36 AM
All I can think is....too science fictiony?

Afan2
April 17th, 2003, 10:56 AM
Originally posted by Flamingo Girl
All I can think is....too science fictiony?

But of course. ;)

Artemis
April 17th, 2003, 12:18 PM
Originally posted by LucianG
Top down board is now in place. It's is supposedly moderated.

http://www.scifi.com/mbb/browse.php?tid=1

Lucian

However, the Farscape board they have is still unmoderated. Are they going to change all the boards or just the BG one?

Afan2
April 17th, 2003, 12:27 PM
Just the BG one, for now. Follow the link.

dvo47p
April 17th, 2003, 12:54 PM
Battlestar Galactica is on the front of http://www.scifi.com Plus an old fashioned
red-eye Cylon is plugging the show Coming in December 2003.

kingfish
April 17th, 2003, 01:00 PM
They upgraded nothing since it is the same old story. No edit options, recent post replies, ect. Even Warner has a better board.