Go Back   Colonial Fleets > BATTLESTAR GALACTICA DISCUSSION AREA > The Last Battlestar......Galactica!
Notices
The Last Battlestar......Galactica! For discussions about the ORIGINAL series
What Dreams May Come!

Reply

 
Thread Tools
Old July 10th, 2003, 08:55 AM   #1
jjrakman
Guest
 
jjrakman's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a

Default "Kill me now." - Bonnie Hammer

`Battlestar Galactica' will get relaunch
Actor Edward James Olmos says Sci Fi Channel's series may rile fans of old program
By R.D. Heldenfels

Edward James Olmos has some advice for fans of the old TV series Battlestar Galactica.

Don't see his Battlestar Galactica.

The new version of the show, which ran on ABC in 1978-79 and as the revamped Galactica 1980 the following year, will air as a four-hour movie on the Sci Fi Channel in December. A series derived from the movie is already in the works.

The earlier series involved the last survivors of an ancient civilization navigating a fleet of spaceships to a new planetary home while being pursued by the evil Cylons bent on their destruction.

As The Complete Directory to Prime Time Network and Cable TV Shows says, ``If this sounds like a copy of the movie Star Wars, it was.'' In fact, the series was seen as a cheap knock-off of the movie, and it drew few viewers during its short TV run.

But like just about anything with spaceships, it retains a fervent following, active on the Internet to this day.

So in making a new version, Sci Fi wants to draw new viewers while not overly antagonizing the old ones, who are already debating the new version's changes. Among them: More sex, more edge and changing the character Starbuck, played by Dirk Benedict on the old show, into a woman, played by Katee Sackhoff (The Education of Max Bickford).

The old show's fans probably will watch the new one just to see how mad it makes them. (Olmos said he and Sackhoff were already getting e-mails from old show fans who are ``really bitter... very angry.'') And there's nothing wrong with revising a production that wasn't very good to begin with.

Still, at a Galactica news conference, people generally tried to appeal to both fans and nonfans.

Ronald D. Moore, writer of the new Galactica, said he was really drawn just to the core idea of the old show, which he felt was more resonant since 9/11.

``You wake up one morning, and your world has changed forever, and what happens to you?'' Moore said. ``What do you do? How do you react to it? How does the guy next to you react to it? What does it say about you?''

However appealing he found that idea, did Moore really think the old Galactica was good? When I asked that, Moore said yes, but with considerable qualifiers.

``I think it was a good show, and that it had an extraordinarily interesting premise,'' he said at first. But he went on to refer to it as ``a show of its time,'' ``more escapist'' than the new version and one that seemed ``more, you know, planet of the week.''

It was sort of difficult, he said ``for that series to find its footing.''

It finally took Olmos to cut through the diplomatic replies and go to the core issue.

``A person who has a really strict belief in the original, I would advise not to watch this program,'' he said. ``It'll hurt them....

``Some of the characters' names are the same, but the intent and the way we are building the (show's) reality is not the reality that was built in the original. So I tell (fans)... buy yourself the new DVDs they are putting out of the old episodes, and whenever we come on just put that one in.''

Sci Fi President Bonnie Hammer stood by as Olmos delivered his warning against a show she was trying to publicize.

``Kill me now,'' she said.

http://www.ohio.com/mld/beaconjourna...ng/6271091.htm


You can write tha author here:
rheldenfels@thebeaconjournal.com
  Reply With Quote
Old July 10th, 2003, 10:04 AM   #2
LucianG
Warrior
 
LucianG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 304

Default My response to Mr. Heldenfels

Dear Mr. Heldenfels:

Thank you for your report on the situation with The SciFi Channel's upcoming production of "Battlestar Galactica". I appreciate your report and the information it conveyed. In case you do any follow-up stories, I wanted to inform you of two statements regarding the original series that were in error. Both occurred in the same sentence:

"In fact, the series was seen as a cheap knock-off of the movie, and it drew few viewers during its short TV run."

First, while elements of "Battlestar Galactica" were influenced by "Star Wars", particularly in regards to John Dyskstra's special effects on both productions, it was in reality a quite different story. Pages can be, and have, been written on the differences. I'll be glad to expound upon that if you'd like, but for now, I must address the more important error. Your statement that the original show drew few viewers is incorrect. The premiere drew approximately 60,000,000 viewers (one of the biggest audiences of the season for any show!), and later episodes regularly appeared in the top 20 shows. Unfortunately, poor writing on a number of episodes and later frequent preemptions led the show to end up slightly lower in the ratings for the season. While the ratings were good, the show was the most expensive to make on TV at the time, so ABC, number one in the ratings during the period, felt those ratings weren't quite good enough. The show was cancelled due to its high production cost. After moving "Mork and Mindy" into the time slot, ABC realized its mistake when "Mork and Mindy" received lower ratings than "Battlestar Galactica". As a result of that and the fan outcry over the inital cancellation, the folks at ABC attempted to revive the show a few months into the 1979-1980 TV season. Unfortunately, like the current SciFi effort, ABC did not listen to the wishes of the fans. Most of the original characters were dumped and the theme was altered over objections from the fans. This resulted in the poor ratings for "Galactica 1980". It was cancelled after only 10 hours of programming.

Thank you again for your report. I look forward to any future reports on this matter.

Sincerely,
__________________
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

"Tilting at the SciFi windmill"
LucianG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 10th, 2003, 11:19 AM   #3
oldwardaggit
You old war daggit!
 
oldwardaggit's Avatar
 
COMMAND INSIGNIAOwner/Webmaster
RadioGalactica

Join Date: May 2001
Location: canada
Posts: 988

Default

Just sent my letter off too.

OWD
__________________
Desanto and Larson, Larson and desanto.
Did you see that? I think the Giant just opened an eye.

OWD
oldwardaggit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 10th, 2003, 04:58 PM   #4
jewels
Stablemaster, Livery Ship
 
jewels's Avatar
 


FORUM STAFFFleet Modertor
Colonial Fleets

Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Wandering Indiana
Posts: 5,101


Default

Just an fyi: if nothing has changed in the last dozen years: The Akron Beacon-Journal is owned by Cox, one of the leading newspaper chains in the country, they also own a lot of community presses and several cable channels. Their flagship paper is the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

Pop quiz: you all know who (network) is HQ'd in Atlanta, correct? Uh-huh.

Make a friend, gang, keep it friendly and informative.

Good find and good job, guys.

Jewels
Who is loving the "just kill me," line. Payback bites hard.
__________________
"We feel free when we escape – even if it be but from the frying pan to the fire." Mozzie on White Collar

"May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one." Malcolm Reynolds [/color]

"We don't dictate to countries, we liberate countries." Mitt Romney [/color]
jewels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 10th, 2003, 05:17 PM   #5
kingfish
Strike Leader
 
kingfish's Avatar
 
COMMAND INSIGNIAAdministrator
Battlestar Pacifica
Battlestar Rycon

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Delray Beach, Florida
Posts: 2,949


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jewels
Just an fyi: if nothing has changed in the last dozen years: The Akron Beacon-Journal is owned by Cox, one of the leading newspaper chains in the country, they also own a lot of community presses and several cable channels. Their flagship paper is the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

Pop quiz: you all know who (network) is HQ'd in Atlanta, correct? Uh-huh.

Make a friend, gang, keep it friendly and informative.

Good find and good job, guys.

Jewels
Who is loving the "just kill me," line. Payback bites hard.
Ted Turner.
kingfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 10th, 2003, 08:08 PM   #6
Senmut
Strike Leader
 
Senmut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wenatchee, Soviet of WA., Ex U.S.A.
Posts: 4,491

Default

Instead of killing her, couldn't we just steam-purge her out a launch tube?
Senmut is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bonnie Hammer Releases Decision :) slider The Last Battlestar......Galactica! 95 February 16th, 2004 03:36 PM
Vote for Bonnie Hammer! jjrakman The Last Battlestar......Galactica! 15 August 3rd, 2003 07:18 PM
Olmos was Duped by Hammer too: jjrakman The Last Battlestar......Galactica! 1 July 11th, 2003 10:10 PM
Bonnie wants to know are you a 'Sci-philes,' 'escapists' or 'young Marvels' dvo47p The Last Battlestar......Galactica! 1 June 2nd, 2003 12:26 PM
the truth behind bonnie hammer default The Last Battlestar......Galactica! 2 March 15th, 2003 04:29 PM




So sez our Muffit!!!

For fans of the Classic Battlestar Galactica series



COPYRIGHT
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:31 AM. Contact the Fleet - Colonial Fleets - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.11, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content and Graphics ©2000-Present Colonial Fleets
The Colonial Fleets Forums are run by Battlestar Galactica fans, paid for by Battlestar Galactica fans, for the enjoyment of fellow Battlestar Galactica fans.



©2000-2008 Colonial Fleets