Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
Looks good.
Is the upper gun in the same emplacement? |
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
Yes, the upper gun will eventually be there. This is just a test fit to see how it would look. I think i'm going to like those emplacements.
:) |
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
Thats looks incredible. Now you just have to decide how many of the suckers your going to install!:salute:
|
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
Altered and put in a second emplacement.
Seems to be about right. Now the process of rebuilding it. :) Quote:
I would imagine a couple inbetween each of the 3 launch tube positions and an equal amount of placements on the inside of the bay's also. |
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
1 Attachment(s)
Up close and personal. I would imagine some sliding doors that would open in order to expose the guns when the laser turrets are activated from the bridge.
|
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
Quote:
Reason? The guns couldn't be fired when Vipers were launching, without risking a Viper being destroyed by friendly fire. Just my two cents but, if creative license were to be exercised, I'd use it to remove those particular gun turrets and locate them somewhere else, perhaps behind the launch tube exit portals. ;) |
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
God knows where you're going to put the rest of them. And don't forget the surface turrets! |
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
Quote:
But again it's just something that didn't make sense at all. I guess it's a catch 22. :) |
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
Quote:
As for the lasers themselves, they must have some sort of recognition system in them that can tell the difference between the shape of a Raider and a Viper, so a friendly fire incident is lessened to a degree. |
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
I never knew where they were til now but they must be there to protect the launch tube and they are far away from the body of the ship. Makes sense to me, get them before they get any closer and they are protected from attack
|
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
Quote:
Please don't misunderstand, I wasn't criticizing Don's placement of the laser batteries. If anything, I was "criticizing" the original designer's choice. As I mentioned, I simply felt that having the laser gun turrets on the same 3-dimensional plane just didn't make much sense since the Vipers would be exiting the ship and flying right into the line of fire being emitted by the laser batteries. |
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
1 Attachment(s)
Well in all honesty i'd have to go with the the thought that the laser stations recognize the viper over an attacking foe. Plus i like Steve's idea about protecting the launch tube's from attack. I mean i guess he's right. If there taken out no launching of vipers.
From a fanboy perspective the batteries are pretty close to where i propose placing them. Now there could by all means be some surface batteries above or below the landing bay's in order to keep raiders at bay while the vipers are being launched. After that all other batteries could be initiated to ward off attacking raiders. Look at this shot. 2 different row's of laser batteries. 1. Upper row laser turrets. 2. lower row lateral lasers-which could include the pulsar cannons along the outside of the landing bays. Of course this is all hersay but does that make sense? :) |
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
Quote:
Hehe, nice composite. ;) |
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
It would make sense that the buttons would operate an array or cluster of weapons. Or maybe there is another panel of switches for the other side of the ship. :D
|
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
Quote:
|
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
When the original was made I wonder how much thought was givin to this?
|
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
Quote:
Oh well it's fun to speculate how and why anyways. Artistic license at work to the fullest. :) |
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
I bet they did not think they would get critics like us LOL
|
Re: A Battlestar Called Galactica...
Quote:
Symetry: if there was a sound (military/tacticle reason for the asymmetry, I would lean toward accuracy to the original. If the asymmetry was a matter of not enough kit parts, or designing on the fly on a deadline, I'd go for symmetry and it's simplicity. Landing bay: make it practical for landing craft (and for storing that EA cruiser, shuttles, raider, etc.) Lifts for vipers to repair areas or to put the launch runs a deck below or above would make a lot of sense to me. I want that dome too, but I think I already used my turn to beg for that a while back. I love that space on the ship. :D Heck, I love going to the planetarium at the Children's Museum because that's as close as I can get to that space's feeling. :D Loved your top view, btw Titon. Jewels |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:21 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.11, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content and Graphics ©2000-Present Colonial Fleets