Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
The May sales figures for this issue are out. It is at #153 sold 14,835. It has beat issues 20 and 21 of the ongoing Star Trek reboot comic book and the re-launched G.I.JOE.
|
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
#153 really isn't that bad considering it isn't a Marvel or DC title.
|
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
Don't let Imperious Leader hear about this!!!
|
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
I'll check with my local comic book store, it looks good.
|
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
Issue #2 is out this week.
|
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
Quote:
|
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
Issue #2 preview: http://www.comicbookresources.com/?p...eview&id=17019
|
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
I just read the first one & liked it a lot, but is it just me- it seemed so short, or did I just read it REAL fast?
|
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
Part two was just as good as the first, maybe better. D'n'A really know how to do last pages!
|
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
New Battlestar Galactica Classic #2 is at 187 10,503.
|
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
1 Attachment(s)
BATTLESTAR GALACTICA #6
Written by Dan Abnett, art by Ceaar Razek, cover by Clint Langley. What is it like to be a member of the Battlestar's valiant crew? Find out in this issue as we follow the highs and lows of one duty shift aboard the Galactica... just a day like any other in the fight to keep Mankind alive! 32 pages, $3.99, in stores on Oct. 16. |
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
Just read issue #3 and it maintained the high standard of the previous issues.
|
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
Quote:
|
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
Battlestar Galactica #3 is listed at 193 at 9,200. Issue 3 was predictable in the older Starbuck and the re-appearance of the Galactica at the end. The use of re-imagined BSG references 'Toaster' for the Cylons. Note: to Dynamite: If no re-imagined BSG references didn't exist in the original BSG TV series run. THEY SHOULD NOT APPEAR IN THE CLASSIC BSG STORIES! Dynamite being late to bring out this issue. Dynamite is still Fracking the original BSG Fans. The writer for this story arc is writing the sequel to Dynamite's Galactica:1980 comic which has the completely implausible destruction of the Galactica by a primitive earth nuclear missle twenty feet over the White House in Washington D.C.
|
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
Quote:
|
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
Quote:
|
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
I don't mean to bust your chops, but the duplicity to which I refer is:
1. You obviously don't like that this comic series, whilst based in original series lore, is using terminology from the new series....apparently some kind of sacrilege or taboo. 2. You use a term that has been given a bit more expletive meaning in the new series to describe how you think original series fans are supposedly being treated by Dynamite....a term that has origins in the 1978 series, albeit with supposedly less profane intent. Ironic? ;) |
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
Quote:
|
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
No need to shout. :)
Your second point is something I had honestly always considered...that perhaps "Frack" was Larson's way of getting around the S&P's and censors of the time. A lot of original series fans would not agree with that supposition however. Many seem to think that it was more like "Oh, darn" rather than the meaning it was given in the recent series. And only Poppa Larson knows for sure what his intent was. :) But yes, Larson had to actually tone down a few things in the original series so that it could air in the late '70's. The relationship between Starbuck and Cassiopea was meant to be a lot steamier...or at least, their little fling in the launch tube in SASW was. The enemy had to be robotic, because the networks didn't want a high, organic body count on a week to week basis. And of course, they had to have a kid and a cutesy robot companion to appeal to children (of which original Galactica's audience was heavily comprised). No, the original series characters did not have first names, and should not have in an ongoing comic series. But cross wiring is not unexpected. Personally, I always had a problem with singular names. What if you're in a room that had three Apollo's in it, and someone calls out "Apollo!"? You're gonna get three heads that turn. It'd be just like trying to get a cute girl's attention in a crowd. "Lisa!......Lisa!" Three or four chicks might turn in the direction of the caller, and a couple of them might not be the attractive one the caller whose attention the caller is trying to get. Granted, in the original series, someone could've said "Apollo, Son of Adama!" and that might yield the more desired result, unless there were two sons of Adama in the room with the name "Apollo". Dawg and I came up with a viable solution, which I used in my "Galactica: The Last Battlestar" story...my own retelling of the fall of the colonies and humanity's exodus to the stars. The formal name for each character is fairly long, and is translated from ancient Kobol. The name basically cites the person, their mother and father, of the planet (enter planet here), of the House of Kobol. (And all Colonials are "of the House of Kobol". The informal version is just their singular name. But, with any naming convention, you can still run into the problem of multiples in a room. At least this gives a bit more effort toward differentiation. :) |
Re: New BG Classic ongoing comic
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:51 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.11, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content and Graphics ©2000-Present Colonial Fleets